![]() ![]() The report also proposes tougher sanctions for non-compliance arising from malicious or intentional data breaches. If staff at all levels are encouraged to highlight potentially insecure actions, then organizations can better target security efforts at people, processes, and technologies most likely to result in problems. Regarding culture change, the need to foster a culture of ‘learning not blaming’ is self-evident. ![]() Peer support from exemplary organizations would also be beneficial, as would regulatory input from initiatives such as NHS Improvement and the Association of Directors of Adult Social Services in England (ADASS). Support for implementing new standards could come from a refreshed IG toolkit and additional expertise from NHS Digital (formerly the Health and Social Care Information Centre – HSCIC). Objective assurance of this compliance would be best carried out by third-parties, with organizations including this as part of their regular internal audit process. Only those found to be compliant would have their contracts extended, thereby providing a mechanism to remove non-compliers. In the first instance, the requirement to comply with data security standards should be written into the financial contracts for organizations. Implementing standards and checking compliance The full list of 10 can be seen on page 22 of the report. Technology: Ensure technology is secure and up-to-date.Process: Ensure the organization proactively prevents data security breaches and responds appropriately to incidents or near misses.People: Ensure staff are equipped to handle information respectfully and safely, according to the Caldicott Principles.Instead, the focus should be on strong leadership in data security, and the report lists 10 standards organized under three leadership obligations: When the costs of licensed documentation and related support were factored in, the report concluded that such standards were not suitable for sector-wide implementation. ![]() With respect to operation in health and social care, organizations were often found to be overwhelmed by highly detailed standards such as ISO/IEC 27001 and ISF SoGP. Information Security Forum’s Standards of Good Practice (ISF SoGP).ISO/IEC 27000:2013 (Information Security Management).Public Services Network – Code of Connection (PSN CoCo).Information Governance Toolkit (IG Toolkit).The report analyzed the following existing standards: Additionally, the self-assessment aspect of compliance mechanisms caused concern with audits generally being welcome since they provided “teeth in enforcement”. StandardsĪ relatively large number of frameworks and standards already exist, and the report states that there is potential for confusion among data controllers. Setting the tone in her foreword to the Report, Dame Caldicott says, “Everyone who uses health and care services should be able to trust that their personal confidential data is protected.” The remit of the report was to recommend new data security standards, a method to check compliance with these standards, and a new consent/opt-out model for data sharing. Understandably, the 2016 report focuses on trust. Following controversy regarding data extraction from GP surgeries in 2016, a further follow-up report was produced. The Caldicott Report produced six principles, with a seventh added in a follow-up report in 2013. Specifically, she looked at how the increasing use of information technology (IT) within the NHS could erode confidentiality due to its ability to quickly propagate information on patients around the care ecosystem. In 1997, Dame Fiona Caldicott examined concerns regarding patient information in the UK’s National Health Service (NHS). patients) sometimes provide their information from a vulnerable position, suffering from reduced cognition, stressed, under medication, etc. The health and social care sector is different, however, in that the data is likely to be more sensitive, and the data generators (i.e. This is true of any sphere where the concept of big data is applied. The use of data gathering, storing, sharing, and analysis in health care can allow for all manner of efficiencies and better services for patients. While the technical aspects of sharing patient data in health and social care continue to evolve, the Review of Data Security from the National Data Guardian focuses on the more permanent issue of building trust. 3: The Impact of new data security standards and opt-out model on the IG Toolkit
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |